Understanding Defective Product Design vs Manufacturing Defects

By Goodwin Johnston LLC
Defective Products written on a paper alongside gavel

Product liability refers to the legal responsibility of manufacturers, designers, and sellers for any harm caused by a defective product. It’s a broad concept that encompasses a variety of issues that can arise during a product’s lifecycle, from the drawing board to the assembly line. Goodwin Johnston LLC is here to help consumers impacted by these defects in Kansas City, Missouri.

Two key categories of product defects are defective product design and manufacturing defects. While both types of defects fall under the umbrella of product liability, they arise from different causes, and understanding the distinction is crucial for anyone involved in product-related legal matters or quality control.

Defective Product Design

Defective product design refers to a flaw in the way a product is conceived and planned before it’s even made. This type of defect occurs when the product's design is inherently unsafe, even when manufactured correctly. 

In essence, the problem lies in the blueprint of the product itself, rather than in the materials or the manufacturing process. These defects can affect entire product lines, as the issue is part of the product’s design specifications.

Defective product design can happen for a number of reasons. Sometimes, designers might fail to consider all possible use scenarios or user behaviors, leading to a product that’s unsafe under certain conditions. Other times, cost-cutting measures may result in designs that prioritize cheaper materials or simpler production methods over safety. 

The design might be lacking necessary safety features or have design flaws that make the product prone to malfunction or breakage. The risk here is that the defect can affect the entire population of products manufactured from the flawed design.

For example, a company might release a toy with small, detachable parts that pose a choking hazard for children. Even if the toy is made according to the specifications, the design itself creates a dangerous condition. 

In such cases, manufacturers could face product liability claims because the inherent flaw was present in the design, not in the process of creating the product. When these issues lead to personal injury by consumers, it’s important to understand the difference between design defects, and manufacturing stage defects, as it can alter legal strategies for compensation.

Manufacturing Defects

Manufacturing defects, on the other hand, arise when something goes wrong during the actual production or assembly of a product. Unlike design defects, manufacturing defects are isolated to specific items rather than an entire line of products. 

They occur when the product is made according to the correct design but is somehow altered or deviates from that design due to mistakes, negligence, or oversight during the production process. The issue could stem from poor quality control, defective materials, improper handling, or faulty machinery.

The difference between a design defect and a manufacturing defect can be illustrated with a simple example. Imagine a company designs a car seat that’s intended to keep children safe in the event of a collision. 

If the car seat is manufactured correctly, using the right materials and assembly processes, it would be considered a properly manufactured product. However, if during production, a batch of defective harness straps is used—such as straps that fail to lock in place due to a flaw in the stitching—the defect is tied to the manufacturing process.

Such defects could arise at any point in the production process, and unlike design defects, they often only affect a limited number of items. In fact, recalls based on manufacturing defects often target specific batches or production runs of products, making it easier to trace back the source of the problem. Let’s break down these differences even further.

Key Differences Between Design and Manufacturing Defects

Though both defective product design and manufacturing defects contribute to product liability, they differ significantly in terms of where the flaw originates and the scope of impact. Below are some of the main differences:

  1. Cause:

    • Defective product design: Originates during the planning or design stage. It’s a fundamental flaw in the way the product was conceived.

    • Manufacturing defect: Arises during the production phase due to errors, substandard materials, or mishandling.


  2. Impact:

    • Defective product design: Affects all products made with that design.

    • Manufacturing defect: Affects only the specific products or batches that were improperly manufactured.


  3. Liability:

    • Defective product design: The designer, manufacturer, and seller may all share liability since the flaw exists in the product’s blueprint.

    • Manufacturing defect: The manufacturer may bear more responsibility, especially if the issue arises due to their oversight or poor quality control.


  4. Examples:

    • Defective product design: A bicycle with a frame that’s too weak to support the rider's weight.

    • Manufacturing defect: A batch of bicycles where the brakes were improperly installed, causing them to fail.

  5. Risk of Injury:

    • Defective product design: Often presents a long-term risk, as it’s built into every product with that design.

    • Manufacturing defect: The risk may be more immediate but typically limited to specific products or batches.

Product Liability and Legal Considerations

Product liability law holds manufacturers, designers, and sellers accountable for defective products that cause harm. When a consumer is injured by a product, they may file a product liability claim based on any of the defects discussed. 

In most cases, plaintiffs have to prove that the defect either caused the injury directly or was the result of negligence on the part of the manufacturer, designer, or seller. For both defective product design and manufacturing defects, the injured party must establish that the product was defectively designed or manufactured and that the defect directly caused harm. 

In a case involving a defective design, the plaintiff would have to show that the design itself was inherently dangerous. For manufacturing defects, the focus would be on proving that the product in question deviated from the approved design and that this deviation caused the harm.

Defective Design and Product Liability

When defective product design is at issue, proving product liability can be more challenging. The plaintiff may need to demonstrate that the design defect existed even before the product was manufactured. 

Often, this type of defect becomes apparent only after the product has been used by consumers, and a pattern of failure emerges. Since the issue resides in the design itself, it’s possible for the product to be dangerous regardless of the specific manufacturing process. 

As such, designers could face significant liability, and the costs of dealing with such cases can be high for manufacturers. Take, for example, a scenario where a kitchen appliance is designed to operate at high temperatures but lacks the necessary heat shielding to prevent burns. 

If a consumer suffers burns while using the appliance, the manufacturer could be held responsible for product liability based on the design flaw. In this case, even if the appliance was manufactured according to specifications, the fundamental flaw in the design would be the root cause of the injury.

Manufacturing Defects and Product Liability

Manufacturing defects are often easier to identify and prove than design defects because they tend to be more isolated. If only a few products from a larger batch are defective, it’s relatively straightforward to trace back the source of the issue. 

This makes manufacturing defect cases more localized and often quicker to resolve. In such cases, product liability claims can target the manufacturer for failing to uphold safety standards during production. Consider a car manufacturer that produces vehicles with faulty airbag sensors in a specific batch. 

If a consumer is injured because the airbags failed to deploy in an accident, a product liability claim could be filed against the manufacturer for the manufacturing defect. The manufacturer would likely be held accountable because the problem occurred during the assembly process, and only that batch of cars was affected.

Personal Injury and Product Liability for Consumers

Consumers who are injured by defective products have legal avenues to seek compensation for their injuries through product liability claims. Whether the defect arises from a flawed design or a manufacturing error, injured parties can file lawsuits against the manufacturers, designers, or retailers responsible. 

Personal injury claims can cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and even punitive damages in cases of gross negligence. For consumers, it’s crucial to document the defect and its impact on their health or safety, including any medical treatment required and evidence of the product's failure. 

In cases of defective design, consumers may need to prove that the design was inherently unsafe, while in manufacturing defect cases, they would need to show that a specific product deviated from its intended design. 

Product liability laws are in place to protect consumers from harm caused by defective products, but pursuing such claims can be challenging without proper evidence and legal support.

Contact Our Experienced Law Firm for Legal Counsel 

Product liability is a significant concern in the marketplace, and both product designers and manufacturers must prioritize safety at every stage of product development. Our firm provides services to clients throughout Missouri, including Kansas City, St. Joseph, Springfield, Columbia, and St. Louis, as well as in Kansas, including Kansas City, Lawrence, Manhattan, Wichita, and Topeka. Connect with Goodwin Johnston LLC to learn more about how we can help you.